The paper sets out to investigate the question of the suitability of the existing ‘equivalence clause’, i.e. Article 40(2) of the Italian penal code, to meet the new requirements of society and the legal world. To do so, a particularly emblematic case is analysed in this sense, namely the Vannini-Ciontoli case. We start by comparing the Italian experience with that of other countries, both common law and civil law; we then focus on the national experience, from the analysis of the constitutional principles to the central theme with the analysis of the ‘functionalist theory’ and the ‘formalist theory’. The comparison of these theories gives rise to the ‘mixed theory’. The Vannini case, in its five levels of judgement, is then retraced, reporting the various opinions of the doctrine, highlighting its merits and flaws. The main questions of law that emerged are then analysed one by one. It concludes with the de lege ferenda perspectives.
L’elaborato si propone di approfondire il quesito circa l’idoneità della vigente “clausola di equivalenza”, ovvero l’articolo 40 comma 2 c.p., a rispondere alle nuove esigenze della società e del mondo giuridico. Per fare ciò si analizza un caso particolarmente emblematico in questo senso, ossia il caso Vannini-Ciontoli. Si parte dal confronto tra l’esperienza italiana e quella di altri Paesi, sia di common law che di civil law; ci si concentra poi sull’esperienza nazionale, dall’analisi dei principi costituzionali sino al al tema centrale con l’analisi della “teoria funzionalistica” e di quella “formale”. Dal confronto di queste teorie nasce la “teoria mista”. Si ripercorre quindi il caso Vannini, nei suoi cinque gradi di giudizio, riportando le varie opinioni della dottrina, evidenziandone pregi e difetti. Vengono, poi, una ad una analizzate le principali questioni di diritto emerse. Si conclude con le prospettive de lege ferenda.
La posizione di garanzia nei reati omissivi impropri: tra l’espansione della giurisprudenza ed il ridimensionamento della dottrina alla luce del caso Vannini
SARTI, MATTEO
2024/2025
Abstract
The paper sets out to investigate the question of the suitability of the existing ‘equivalence clause’, i.e. Article 40(2) of the Italian penal code, to meet the new requirements of society and the legal world. To do so, a particularly emblematic case is analysed in this sense, namely the Vannini-Ciontoli case. We start by comparing the Italian experience with that of other countries, both common law and civil law; we then focus on the national experience, from the analysis of the constitutional principles to the central theme with the analysis of the ‘functionalist theory’ and the ‘formalist theory’. The comparison of these theories gives rise to the ‘mixed theory’. The Vannini case, in its five levels of judgement, is then retraced, reporting the various opinions of the doctrine, highlighting its merits and flaws. The main questions of law that emerged are then analysed one by one. It concludes with the de lege ferenda perspectives.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SARTI.MATTEO.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
1.58 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14251/3282